"BOTERO SEES THE WORLD'S TRUE HEAVIES AT ABU GHRAIB" By Erica Jong
By Erica Jong, Special to The Washington Post
Sunday, November 4, 2007
When we think about the Colombian artist Fernando 
Botero, most of us visualize his roly-poly people 
flaunting their fat, their fashionable headgear, 
their cigarettes and cigarette holders, their 
excess. I never thought of these as political 
images until I saw Botero's Abu Ghraib series in 
which hooded men dangle, upside down, and hideous 
dogs claw and growl at manacled prisoners 
arranged into pyramids and bleeding on each other.
Held by their hair, their hands, their manacles, 
the prisoners seldom come face-to-face with their 
torturers. They are beaten by hands outside the 
picture frame, urinated on by men whose faces 
rarely appear. A bound prisoner wears red panties 
and a bra -- obviously against his will. The 
torture is anonymous and masked. Even the 
prisoners are masked so the torturers cannot be 
identified. But Botero knows who they are. They 
are the same fat people whose antics he has 
previously appeared to delight in.
As a result of this astonishing series of 
drawings and paintings, we know he was not 
celebrating these people, only waiting for an 
opportunity to show their true nature. They are 
cannibals who feed off their brothers. They deal 
in the anguish of human flesh.
Fernando Botero, whose Abu Ghraib pictures will 
be on view at American University starting this 
week, read about the torturers of Abu Ghraib in 
the New Yorker, and made his own record of the 
horrors. He did not invent anything that was not 
described, but because he is an artist, we feel 
the terror of the tortured rather than the 
gloating of the torturers -- so present in the 
photographs they took of themselves at play in 
the blood of others.
Botero calls art "a permanent accusation," but 
his Abu Ghraib series seems to me more than an 
accusation. Rather, it constitutes a complete 
revision of whatever we have previously thought 
of Botero's work. (He refuses to sell these works 
because he doesn't want to profit from the pain 
of others. He plans to donate them to museums.)
What is this need people have to abuse each 
other, then boast about it? What is this need to 
make others powerless before them, to see them 
bleed and scream and beg for mercy? Psychologists 
theorize that torturers are repeating their 
infantile impotence by inflicting it on others. 
That seems glib to me. Empathy is a rare human 
quality, but it is essential to our humanity.
But American torture is different from other 
tortures because of the high opinion we have of 
our country and ourselves. Torture is something 
others do. We are above that. We are reasonable 
people governed by a great Enlightenment document 
we call The Constitution. We help, not hurt 
people all over the world. It is the incongruity 
of our image of ourselves versus the reality of 
our behavior that stings most.
Botero's Abu Ghraib series has been shown before, 
but never in Washington. It is a moment: The 
people who got us into Abu Ghraib can contemplate 
what went on there.
I dare them to look at these images and be unmoved.
The series's entry into the visual world has not 
been easy. In the Bay Area, they were shown not 
in a museum, but in a library at the University 
of California at Berkeley. Still 15,000 people 
saw them.
Susan Sontag wrote that the Abu Ghraib 
photographs showed "the reigning admiration for 
unapologetic brutality." Is this true?
I doubt it. I think that most of the people who 
see these Botero images will be as horrified as I 
am. Complicity in torture is invisible to most 
people. They do not know what they can do to 
prevent it -- hence their passivity.
Botero, inspired by Picasso's "Guernica," broke 
through his passivity by making these works. Many 
people have contrasted them with his supposedly 
"happy" fat people. I don't think Botero's fat 
people are happy at all. I think they are also 
political -- the haves fattening on the invisible 
have-nots.
"The whole world and myself were very shocked 
that the Americans were torturing prisoners in 
the same prison as the tyrant they came to 
remove," Botero said to the San Francisco 
Chronicle. "The United States presents itself as 
a defender of human rights and of course as an 
artist I was very shocked with this and angry. 
The more I read, the more I was motivated. . . . 
I think Seymour Hersh's article was the first one 
I read. I was on a plane and I took a pencil and 
paper and started drawing. Then I got to my 
studio and continued with oil paintings. I 
studied all the material I could. It didn't make 
sense to copy, I was just trying to visualize 
what was really happening there."
What will be our reaction to his visualization? 
Will we continue in passivity? Will we deny that 
such horrors still take place? Or will Botero's 
art have the power to change us?
We might also ask what power art can have in 
general. Did Goya stop cruelty in his time, or 
Picasso in his? No. But the role of the artist in 
raising our consciousness and bearing witness is 
essential. The artist makes us open our eyes to 
our own cruelty, our own passivity, our own 
indifference.
For that alone, his witnessing matters.
I am looking at another recent work by Botero in 
which a roly-poly woman is stuffing her face with 
an apple as if she were a Christmas pig. Before 
the Abu Ghraib series I would have shrugged off 
this image. Now I see all Botero's work as a 
record of the brutality of the haves against the 
have-nots. I would be surprised if the Abu Ghraib 
series of images did not completely change our 
view of Botero as an artist.
Pics @ <http://www.marlboroughgallery.com/artists/botero/artwork.html>
Novelist, poet and nonfiction writer Erica Jong 
wrote a catalogue essay for the Milan exhibition 
of Botero's Abu Ghraib pictures and has a Botero 
sculpture of Eve with a snake and an apple in her 
apartment in New York. Her most recent book is 
"Seducing the Demon: Writing for My Life."
If you go: "Fernando Botero: Abu Ghraib" opens 
Tuesday at the American University Museum at the 
Katzen Arts Center, at the intersection of 
Massachusetts and Nebraska avenues NW. Through 
Dec. 30. Open Tuesday-Sunday 11 a.m.-4 p.m. Free. 
202-885-1300.
© 2007 The Washington Post Company



0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home