January 28, 2008
'BANKSY'S IDEAS HAVE THE VALUE OF A JOKE'
The respect given to 'street art' is a measure of 
how puerile and idiotic contemporary art has 
become
Matthew Collings
Do you like adolescent entertainment? Do you have 
the mentality of a teenager? Do you find Cézanne 
a bit overrated? If the answer is yes, yes and 
yes, then I don't know what to do with you. You 
are a childish philistine literalist. Get down to 
Bonhams (one of the world's oldest and largest 
auctioneers of fine art and antiques) next 
Tuesday for their first-ever dedicated sale of 
"street art" - this is the experience for you.
"Street art" means graffiti, comics-style stuff, 
spray-paint art, flyposting - the art of groovy 
youth. The stars of the street-art sale will 
include Banksy, Keith Haring, Jean-Michel 
Basquiat, Antony Micallef, Adam Neate, Faile, 
Paul Insect, Space Invader, Swoon, D*Face and 
Shepard Fairey.
Basquiat, who died of an overdose in 1988, was 
funny and witty, and he had a great sense of 
bitter irony about black cultural history: he 
shared this sensibility with many people. But he 
was a great mark-maker, an arranger of forms, he 
could make surfaces breath and colours sing, and 
all this made him extremely rare. As an artist 
Haring (who died of an Aids-related illness three 
years after Basquiat) was nothing like in 
Basquiat's league: he had commercial appeal but 
was too visually repetitive and sterile to be 
significant beyond his own brief moment. 
Basquiat's shining light shows up the visual 
boredom of the rest of the "street art" crew - 
they are funny and punky, sure, but, well, who 
isn't?
Gareth Williams, the urban-art specialist at 
Bonhams, says: "By transposing their images from 
street wall to canvas, urban artists are now 
creating a permanent legacy without compromising 
the vitality of their art." Poor Williams - how 
giddy and weightless life must be for him, to be 
in the business of using words without having any 
interest in what they mean.
"Vitality" is what Matisse or Goya has, or 
Islamic mosaics, or Greek statues, or abstract 
paintings by Jackson Pollock - all that old 
obscure stuff. Vitality in art is a rare quality, 
it means life - you see it and you feel life is 
worth living. It goes with originality and 
surprise, a mixture of the fresh and the eternal. 
It's found throughout the history of art. It's 
the opposite of convention and routine. The point 
about street art is that it has to conform to 
street-art convention. It has to be a routine. It 
has to express the personality of a stoner, 
grinning, funny and kidlike.
What can you get at the auction? You can be the 
owner of Banksy's Laugh Now, in stencil paint on 
canvas, for only £40,000. It shows a chimp with a 
sign round its neck that reads: "You can laugh 
but one day we'll be in charge." What would you 
really be buying? A status symbol - the work has 
no value as art. But owning it would make you 
modern and clever. Or stupid. It's a fine line.
A work by Banksy sold at auction for £288,000 
last April. He is collected by Damien Hirst, who 
we know is incredibly wealthy - but so what? 
Hirst's paintings of his son being born cost £1 
million each and visually they are junk. They are 
only valuable because of a market consensus, not 
because they connect to anything important. Most 
of life is made up of trivia, and there's nothing 
wrong with celebrating it. But it's something 
else again to revere it as if it's the pyramids; 
there's something sick about that.
"Street art" is adolescent. With the exception of 
Basquiat, the artists whose work is on sale at 
Bonhams next week are talented people in that 
area, but the area itself is of absolutely no 
interest unless you've got an arrested mentality. 
Its rise as something to take seriously says 
something about the weird state of art now. The 
core of art today is satire and gags and 
attention-getting stunts. As a society we all 
kind of know this but somehow we also accept that 
it's a social faux pasever to mention it. Banksy 
being considered a "conceptual artist" is only a 
measure of how banal and feeble the "concepts" of 
contemporary art are, and an indication of art's 
slide into all-out philistinism. To appear 
tuned-in we now have to pretend that a literal 
crack in the floor at Tate Modern means global 
unease (the latest commission by Tate Modern in 
its annual Unilever series), that a lot of real 
people standing on a marble plinth means 
"humanity" (Anthony Gormley's proposal for a new 
work on the fourth plinth in Trafalgar Square) 
and that Marc Quinn's new sculptures at White 
Cube of foetuses are "influenced by Michelangelo".
Banksy's ideas only have the value of a joke. 
What is an idea in real or high art? This is a 
puzzle for Williams, Bonhams press-release 
writer, but also apparently a puzzle for the 
guardians and spokespersons of culture now. When 
contemporary-art explainers are asked on to Radio 
4's Front Row or BBC Two's Late Review to enthuse 
about new art shows, the hosts never challenge 
the rubbish they spout. Mark Lawson doesn't know 
about art, but also he doesn't want to seem 
offensive. And yet he does know about ideas, and 
he must see that Anthony Gormley doesn't really 
have them in any important sense - Lawson starts 
reasonably enough, not wanting to appear gauche 
in a conversation about art, but he ends up 
actually believing the bullshit.
The result is a culture subscribed to by many, 
many intelligent people, in which another level 
of meaning operates where art is concerned than 
the level that operates for, say, books by J. M. 
Coetzee. With the former we accept an unaesthetic 
experience and an explanation that is shallow 
where it is not incomprehensible. And with the 
latter we're in awe of wit, learning, craft, 
knowledge and surprise; we're amazed that the 
depths of what it feels like to be a suffering, 
feeling, joyful, thinking human being right now 
can be captured by art. With Banksy (as with 
Hirst) we're just amazed that he could be so rich.
Laughing all the way to the Banksy
Online bidding for a wall painted on by Banksy 
closed earlier this month with a final price of 
£208,100, after 69 bids. The owner of the wall, 
Luti Fagbenle, estimated that the cost of removal 
of the piece would be around £5,000, to be paid 
by the buyer.
In October 2006, a Banksy painting used for the 
cover of Blur's Think Tank album - of an 
embracing couple dressed in deep-sea diving gear 
- sold at Bonhams for £62,400, ten times the 
original estimate.
The previous month, the graffiti artist staged a 
show in Los Angeles, at which Angelina Jolie is 
reported to have spent £200,000 on his work. 
Christina Aguilera is another celebrity fan - she 
visited Banksy's Soho gallery during a trip to 
London in April 2006 and paid £25,000 for three 
works, including one depicting Queen Victoria in 
a lesbian clinch with a prostitute.
Bombing Middle England, a painting of pensioners 
playing bowls with bombs, fetched a whopping 
£102,000, more than double its highest estimated 
price of £50,000, at Sotheby's in February last 
year.
In the same sale, Banksy's Balloon Girl sold for 
£37,200, and another work called Bomb Hugger for 
£31,200.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
>>>
ART ATTACK
Peter Kennard
Published 17 January 2008
Banksy attracts the press attention, but around 
him is an increasingly influential movement of 
political artists operating outside the mainstream
The phone rings; the number is withheld. It's 
Banksy. He wants to know whether I can go to 
Bethlehem over Christmas. He is putting on an 
exhibition, bringing together like-minded artists 
from all over the world to raise awareness of the 
situation in Palestine. Like the annual guerrilla 
art shows that have taken place in London for the 
past six years, it will be called "Santa's 
Ghetto". Two weeks later, I find myself involved 
in an experience that transforms my ideas about 
what artists can do in the face of oppression.
We are living through an exciting time for 
political art. I have been an artist for 40 
years, and my work has always focused on 
political and social issues. In the 1970s, I 
started making photo montage work, drawing on 
imagery from the Vietnam War and the row over 
nuclear armaments (a retrospective opens at the 
Pump House Gallery this month). Since the 
build-up to the Iraq War in 2002, I have been 
collaborating with a younger artist, Cat Picton 
Phillipps, developing new techniques and using 
digital technology to expose the lies that led to 
the invasion and the subsequent humanitarian 
disaster.
Over this period, our work has become linked to a 
group of young artists who work outside the 
official art world. Most of them started out 
painting graffiti on walls. The central figure in 
this group is Banksy, but although he attracts 
most of the press coverage, he is surrounded by a 
growing band of talented, politically committed 
artists. Our associates come from Spain and 
Italy, the US, Britain and Palestine. Since the 
era of the Bush/Blair war in Iraq, this movement 
has become increasingly politicised, just as my 
generation was politicised by the war in Vietnam. 
These are artists who want to connect with the 
real world, rather than work for the market, 
which has more of a stranglehold on art than 
ever. They combine creativity with protest, 
insisting that art should be more than the icing 
on the cake for the super-rich.
We arrived in Bethlehem with four fellow artists: 
Blu, an Italian who has painted on walls from 
Bologna to Buenos Aires; Sam3, from Spain; the 
long-standing Banksy collaborator Paul Insect, 
from Britain; and Gee Vaucher, another Brit and 
the only other artist of my generation. The rest 
are all in their thirties and come from 
street-art backgrounds. All of them are well 
informed about the Middle East and came to 
Bethlehem to show their solidarity with the 
Palestinians.
Banksy had been to the West Bank a number of 
times to paint on the Separation Wall. He knows 
and understands the situation and had a team of 
focused, sussed people working with him. They 
found a disused fast-food joint in Manger Square 
and managed to rent it. The idea was to show a 
combination of western and Palestinian artists. 
The art was available to buy on site only, so if 
you wanted to get hold of the latest Banksy or 
any of the other artworks, you would have to 
travel to Bethlehem to place a bid. This was 
important, because Bethlehem is being starved of 
its tourist trade as visitors are bussed in to 
see the Church of the Nativity and bussed out an 
hour later back to Israel. All proceeds from the 
sale, which exceeded $1m, went to local charities.
For our contribution, Cat and I decided to print 
a dollar bill across 18 sheets of the Jerusalem 
Post, ripped through to expose images of 
pre-Naqba Palestine. The pictures show the 
richness of Palestine's history and the diversity 
of its culture - a sobering antidote to the 
stereotype of a violent, irrational people that 
we so often see on the news. We wanted to make 
the work in Bethlehem because taking finished 
pieces over would be difficult, given Israel's 
heavy and ever-changing restrictions on what and 
who can travel in to the Palestinian territories.
We teamed up with a group of Palestinians, who 
helped to get hold of materials and sort out 
logistics. They also gave us all a window on life 
in the West Bank, with looming Israeli 
settlements and endless checkpoints. Every night 
we would pile into a kebab restaurant, where we 
would drink and dance, arguing over and 
discussing that day's work. One night over 
dinner, the Palestinians recounted how they had 
been held and tortured by the Israeli authorities 
while they were still in their mid-teens. It was 
extraordinary how welcoming they were to this 
motley band of artists. All the privations and 
restrictions have only increased the 
Palestinians' resilience and their desire to 
communicate with the outside world.
Through these friends we found a commercial 
printing house in Hebron, which got involved in 
sorting out our highly unconventional printing 
needs. This involved printing a giant dollar 
across many sheets of newspaper and also making a 
giant print to plaster on the Separation Wall. 
The printers immediately committed their time and 
energy to the project, and ended up printing for 
Banksy and the other artists.
Through this process of making, the people of 
Bethlehem became involved in what the work was 
saying. After we pasted our picture on the wall, 
we went for tea in the cafe opposite. The cafe 
owner, whose business has been destroyed by the 
wall, told us he appreciated the statement we had 
plastered on to the cement that he has to stare 
at every day of his life.
Sticking up a poster or painting the Separation 
Wall in the West Bank might sound 
inconsequential, but these are highly practical 
ways to help, in contrast to the intellectual 
interventions prevalent in much contemporary art. 
They contribute to a town and a people that are 
having their lifeblood strangled out of them.
In this context, it is important that the work 
communicates directly to the Palestinian people. 
While there has been a move to take on 
contemporary issues in a direct way in the 
theatre, in visual art the idea still holds that 
if you have something to say about the world, you 
have to hide it behind theory and obscurity. It 
sometimes seems that Britain's art colleges turn 
out experts in camouflage, rather than fine art.
The pressure of world events is so great that it 
is increasingly difficult to sustain the idea of 
art for art's sake. Radical art and politics 
converge in times of crisis, and that is 
happening now. I know, from my experience as a 
tutor at the Royal College of Art and at the 
University of the Arts in London, that the 
ironies of the Nineties YBA movement are now a 
thing of the past. Many art students and young 
artists are searching for ways to make a direct 
connection between their awareness of how things 
are in the world and their own art practice.
This involves thinking about not only the form of 
the art itself, but also the process of making. 
There are many collaborations taking place across 
media and disciplines, and artists are looking 
for new methods of distribution.
Unlike in my youth, there is no organised "left" 
into which artists can slot, but there is a 
concrete wall, 425 miles long, and we can turn it 
into an international canvas of dissent.
"Uncertified Documents", a retrospective of work 
by Peter Kennard, opens at the Pump House 
Gallery, Battersea Park, London SW11 on 30 
January.
Four to watch
Blu burst on to the public-art scene after the 
success of his contributions to the "Urban Edge" 
show in Milan in 2005. His reputation is built on 
expansive, surreal, often aggressive wall and 
pavement murals. Though renowned for his 
playfulness, acclaimed pieces from 2007, such as 
Fantoche in Switzerland, Letter A in New York and 
Reclaim Your City in Berlin, have a more macabre 
tone.
Suleiman Mansour co-founded al-Wasiti Art Centre 
in east Jerusalem, which he now directs, and went 
on to lead the New Vision artists' group, which 
proved influential during the first intifada. A 
pioneer of resistance art, Mansour makes work 
that revolves around the Palestinian struggle. He 
was head of the League of Palestinian Artists for 
four years, and won the Nile Award at the 1998 
Cairo Biennale as well as the Palestine Prize for 
the Visual Arts the same year. He is famous for 
using locally sourced materials, such as mud and 
henna, in his pieces.
Sam3 (Samuel Marín) comes from Granada in 
southern Spain, where his ephemeral long, black 
silhouettes haunt the cityscape. Famous works 
include his 12 Shadows project for AlterArte and 
the iconic Erase Yourself, a silent protest 
against the civic legal authorities for removing 
graffiti in Barcelona.
Paul Insect is a London-based ex-designer whose 
pioneering of "steampunk", a mixture of Gothic 
Victoriana and futuristic themes, has proved 
popular with the British arts intelligentsia. In 
July last year, Damien Hirst bought his entire 
"Bullion" show at the Lazarides Gallery in Soho. 
His painting Unicorn sold for an estimated 
£24,500 at Sotheby's last month.
Pics <http://www.blublu.org/>
<http://tinyurl.com/2gnv4v>
<http://www.ixovoxi.com/>
<http://www.paulinsect.com/>
<http://www.woostercollective.com/2004/12/new_work_from_paul_insect.html>
  © New Statesman 1913-2007